Atonement and the New Covenant…

How are we to understand the apparent contradiction that Yom Kippur is to be observed as a “statute forever” (Lev. 16:29) while the New Testament emphatically states that Yeshua puts an end to animal sacrifice and now is our eternal atonement (Heb. 9:12; Heb. 9:24-26)? To begin we must note that this contradiction only arises when we make the (false) assumption that the Sinai covenant could never be abrogated, which would imply that a new covenant is logically impossible. If we can only relate to God through the covenantal terms given at Sinai, in other words, then the Levitical priesthood (alone) serves to mediate us before God, and there would be no need for a covenant based on the better priesthood and promises of the Messiah (Heb. 8:6). Nevertheless, the new covenant was clearly foretold throughout the Torah, the writings, and the prophets, and the assumption that the Sinai covenant is “immutable” is therefore false. We can understand this by an analogy: If an employer makes a contract with an employee with certain provisions and conditional benefits that are subject to annual review, but later rescinds that contact and offers a new one with far better benefits, there is no contradiction involved. In our case a real contradiction would be, “you must observe Yom Kippur forever,” and then – in the very same contract – later read, “you no longer need observe Yom Kippur forever.”

Since the Torah says of the Yom Kippur ritual, “this shall be a statute forever (חֻקַּת עוֹלָם) for you, that atonement may be made for the people of Israel once in the year because of all their sins” (Lev. 16:34), it is urgent for us to explore what “forever” might mean in this case, especially in light of the atonement given in Yeshua. First, we note that the Hebrew word translated “forever” is olam (עוֹלָם), which is derived from a root verb alam (עָלַם) that means “to conceal” or “to hide.” Olam may have its origins using spatial imagery, a distance so vast that it is unseen, beyond the horizon, and therefore it can also mean “world.” When it is applied to the terms of the Sinai covenant (and the Tabernacle represents the “ritual expression” of that covenant), the word means perpetual, ongoing, etc., in the horizon of domain or “world.” It is interesting to note that the Jewish sages never regarded “olam” as unchangeable, since in the world to come Torah will come from Zion (Isa. 2:3). For more on this important point, see the article “Olam HaTorah: The World of the Torah.”

Second, we must remember that Torah (תּוֹרָה) is a “function word” that expresses our responsibility in light of the covenantal acts of God, and if you choose to relate to God by means of the Sinai covenant, you are liable to the terms and provisions of that contract (e.g., niddah laws, blood ritual laws, tithing laws, agricultural laws, etc.), and this includes being liable to the enumerated curses for disobedience (tochachah). The covenant at Sinai is indeed eternal and never can change – it is brit olam, a perpetual covenant – but if you choose to abide by its terms, you are responsible for your side of the contract… The Book of Hebrews states: “When there is a change in the priesthood (הַכְּהוּנָּה), there is necessarily (ἀνάγκη) a change in the Torah as well” (Heb. 7:12). The Levitical priesthood expresses the Torah of the Covenant of Sinai (בְּרִית יְשָׁנָה), just as the greater priesthood of Yeshua expresses the Torah of the New Covenant (בְּרִית חֲדָשָׁה).

Third, Yeshua our Messiah came to deliver us from sin and to establish the new covenant with God, which both transcends the covenant given at Sinai and provides an entirely new way to be in relationship with God by the power of the Holy Spirit. The new covenant sets us free from the terms of Sinai (by the death of the Testator, Heb. 9:15) so that we might serve God in a new and better way (see Jer. 31:33; Rom. 7:1-6; Heb. 8:6; Rom. 9:31-32; Acts 13:39; Gal. 4:21-5:1). We “die” to the terms of the former contract to serve God in a new and powerful way (Rom. 7:1-4), with the inner intent of the law written upon our hearts (Jer. 31:31-33). This is the “deeper Torah” that goes back to the original covenant made in the Garden of Eden (for more on this, see “The Gospel in the Garden”).

Fourth, Yeshua is the King, the Lawgiver of Torah, and its Substance: he did not come to destroy the Law and the Prophets, but to fulfill their message and meaning (Matt. 5:17-18; Rom. 10:4). As the King, he has the authority to annul contracts with his subjects, and he has the authority to implement new agreements based on his sovereign will… The Torah of Moses commanded, “Thou shalt not kill…” but the King of Torah (מלך התורה) went to the heart of the matter, explaining that murder was a symptom of the deeper sin of anger…

Finally, those who follow the law of Moses simply cannot keep the Day of Atonement as clearly commanded in the Book of Leviticus, nor have Jews been able to do so since 70 AD, after the destruction of the Second Temple as foretold by Yeshua (Matt. 24:2; Luke 19:41-4). Note that this was by divine design, since the way into the Holy of Holies (i.e., kodesh hakodashim: קדֶשׁ הַקֳּדָשִׁים) was not yet open for all as long as the “outer tent” still stood (i.e., the Levitical priesthood as the ritualistic expression of the covenant made at Sinai), since that was symbolic of “the present age,” or the “dispensation that was passing away” (Heb. 8:13, 9:8-9; for more, see “The Parochet Rent in Two”). Despite the later invention of “Judaism without the Temple,” the life is indeed “in the blood” (Lev. 17:11) and in Messiah we are given fullness of life! Only Yeshua gives us true atonement, and that’s the true Torah of the LORD! The redemption obtained by animal sacrifices was merely provisional and symbolic, “for it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins” (Heb. 10:4). For eternal remedy something far greater was needed, namely, the sacrifice of God Himself. Consequently, when Yeshua came into the world, he said, “Sacrifices and offerings you have not desired, but a body have you prepared for me,” and “’Behold, I have come to do your will, O God, as it is written of me in the scroll of the book” (Heb. 10:5,7). As the Book of Hebrew states: “We have an altar, whereof they have no right to eat who serve the Tabernacle” (i.e., the Levitical system of worship). We are cleansed from our sins and made eternally right with God because of the cross of Yeshua…

The bottom line is this. We have a greater High Priest who intercedes for us by means of his own shed blood within the true Holy of Holies, “made without hands,” in the olam of reality. We do not mix the covenants of God, for this leads to double-mindedness and is regarded as spiritual adultery (Rom. 7:1-4). Remember: The promised “new covenant” (ברית חדשׁה) is “not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt (Jer. 31:32), that is, it is not like the covenant made at Sinai with Moses’ mediation. It is chillul HaShem – the desecration of the Name above all Names – to turn away from the meaning and message of the cross of Messiah.